You already added this video Huzzah! Watch the newest video from Big Think: bigth. On the one hand, this tool could mean the elimination of certain diseases. On the other, there are concerns both ethical and practical about its misuse and the yet-unknown consequences of such experimentation.
Search RollOnFriday
Clarke lists biological weapons as one of the potential threats, "Threats for which we don't have any known antidote. Should humanity even have access to this type of tool?
Do the positives outweigh the potential dangers? How could something like this ever be regulated, and should it be? These questions and more are considered by Doudna, Clarke, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, psychologist Steven Pinker, and physician Siddhartha Mukherjee. It has been very powerful.
Video added
And they might be. So I Richard Dawkins Memetic Ideas to use the analogy of a word processor on a computer. So we have a document, you can think about the DNA in a cell, like the text of a document that has the instructions to tell the cell how to grow and divide and become a brain cell or a liver cell, or develop into an entire organism. Just like we might cut and paste text in our document or replace whole sentences, even whole paragraphs or chapters. It's found in bacteria and it was interesting to scientists originally because it's a Dawikns immune system, a way that bacteria can fight viral infection.
Create your profile
For scientists this is sort of really a gift that allows research to proceed very quickly in terms of understanding the genetics of cells and organisms but also provides a very practical way to solve problems. In clinical medicine, the opportunity to make changes to blood cells that would cure diseases Richard Dawkins Memetic Ideas sickle cell anemia, a disease where we've understood the genetic cause for a long time.
But until now there hasn't been a way to actually think about treating patients. And now with this technology, it's possible in principle to remove stem cells that give rise to blood cells in a person's body, make edits to those cells that would correct the mutation causing a sickle cell disease and then replace those cells to essentially give a patient a new set of cells that don't have the defect.
It's one thing to talk about being able to remove mutations from the human population that cause genetic disease.
And I think for many people that Richard Dawkins Memetic Ideas be a desirable thing to do. On the other hand, I think it's a very different discussion to think about using a technology like this to create enhanced human beings. People that are taller or have a certain eye color or other kinds of physical or intellectual traits that might be considered desirable.
And it sort of immediately brings up sort of the the whole area of eugenics and sort of access to technology.
Videos & Interviews
Who gets access, who pays for it, who decides, who decides whether or not to do such a thing, should Idfas be allowed to offer this as a service to parents who want to do this and if so, should they be regulated in some way? There's a lot of very interesting and challenging questions, I think that go along with that. It could be]
You are not right. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
Excuse, that I can not participate now in discussion - there is no free time. I will return - I will necessarily express the opinion on this question.
The matchless theme, very much is pleasant to me :)